Reviewed by Nicholas J. Michalak
Rating: 9/10
The Exorcist franchise is like a roller-coaster - lots of ups
and downs. The original film is an eternal, bona-fide classic.
The
Exorcist II, while I have never seen it, is general revered as a terrible
mess of a film. Things swing upward with William Peter Blatty's The
Exorcist III. Blatty adapts his novel Legion into this theatrical
outing with him directing as well. While this film is very much in
a far better direction, there was studio interference which mostly complicated
and muddled the film's ending. Still, there's a surprisingly creepy
piece of horror cinema to behold.
Set 15 years after the events of the first film, we mainly follow Lieutenant
Bill Kinderman (now portrayed by George C. Scott) who has formed a friendship
with Father Dyer (Ed Flanders), friend and confidante of the late Damien
Karras. It's an odd friendship built on a love of movies and the
memory of Karras. The Lieutenant is investigating an erie string
of disturbing murders that harken back to those of the Gemini Killer (Brad
Dourif), who was executed 15 years earlier. There's a religious subtext
of some of the murders, but none of the evidence pieces together from one
death to the next. Things become stranger when investigating at the
hospital Kinderman discovers an isolated mental patient who claims to be
James Venamun, the Gemini Killer, but bares a striking resemblance to Father
Damien Karras (Jason Miller). He is clearly insane, but knows everything
about the original Gemini killings., He also refers constantly to "the
master" who slipped him into this body as Karras was slipping out after
his fateful fall down the steps fighting Pazuzu. Kinderman can't
see the evil within, but he feels it and knows the death and dismemberment
it has caused. As Kinderman comes closer to deciphering this demonic
mystery, his own soul and life could easily be in danger as well as others'.
This is a positive review, but I'm going to start out with the bad first,
just to change up the template. The ending to this film was changed
because after the studio renamed the film from the novel's title of Legion
to The Exorcist III, they realized there wasn't a single exorcism
in the script. To accommodate this, an extra plot line was introduced
which bought Jason Miller back, and a line about seeing through "the eyes
of faith." None of that is really a problem in terms of storytelling
or the quality of the film. Where the problem lies is the climax
and conclusion of the film. What we're inevitably left with is an
overly grandiose exorcism with a breadth of biblical and blasphemous imagery
which seems a little out of place and over-the-top. Granted, there
is a heavenly dream sequence with a wealth of respective imagery.
Also, there are supernatural elements throughout the film, but they're
more subtle. This ending breaks the restraints and lets it flow.
In one perspective, it might seem appropriate like the gates of hell have
been breached, and everything is being unleashed. Unfortunately,
it just doesn't mesh well enough with the rest of the film's style, and
twists the story into an odd direction which isn't all that satisfying
or coherent. Also, there's the dictated addition of Father Paul Morning
(Nicol Williamson) to the film. This change causes some continuity
problems, and seems like an irrelevant diversion from the plot until the
finale justifies it. All this doesn't kill the movie, but I would've
been interested to see what Blatty originally had in mind. Apparently,
the novel does not have a happy ending.
Onto the good stuff. George C. Scott commands this movie.
From the guy who won an Academy Award for his powerhouse portrayal of General
George S. Patton (though, declined the award), that's to be expected.
He offers up a dry sense of humor, some degree of grief, but overall, he
provides conviction and intensity to Bill Kinderman. The highly acclaimed
character actor Lee J. Cobb originated the role in the 1973 film, but the
actor passed away from a heart attack three years later. Ed Flanders
takes over the role of Father Dyer (making him older than he should be)
from the real-life priest, Father William O'Malley. Jason Miller
is the only returning cast member from the original film, and does a very
subdued and creepy performance as the brain damaged 'Patient X.'
Though, where the acting really soars is Brad Dourif. Whatever roll
he was on going into this film, it made his performance enveloping.
You just can't turn away. With the monologues he had to deliver,
the role and performance could've killed the film, dragging it down into
boredom. Fortunately, Dourif has a magnetism that just reels you
in hook, line, and sinker. His charisma eats up the scene, and the
sparks that fly between him and Scott is the meat of the piece.
This was only the second film directed by William Peter Blatty.
The first being The Ninth Configuration from 1980 which Blatty once
considered the real sequel to The Exorcist despite it's connection
being one briefly seen, unnamed character from 1974 film. Despite
such a brief acting résumé, Blatty shows a lot of skill and
competency here. This film oozes with creepiness, making it one that'll
twitch your nerves, and keep you jumping. There is one particular
sequence featuring a white gown and a killer musical stinger that'll freak
you out. Just thinking about it gives me the chills. No matter
your own opinion of the film, this sequence will get you every time.
The musical score by Barry De Vorzon is quite fitting, and immensely
effective. I was previously familiar with his haunting and intense
score on the cult urban action film The Warriors, which was very
much of its time in the late 70s. The Exorcist III score is
much more traditional, but still haunting as well as chilling.
The director of photography, Gerry Fisher, gives this picture great
composition and an amazing look in certain scenes. Every time the
film ventures into the isolation chamber, the lighting is so beautiful
in an exceptionally dark and erie fashion. Fisher previously lensed
the classic Highlander with amazing artistic talent, and wonderful
composition. The Exorcist III doesn't call for anything as
epic as Highlander, but the artistry is still evident. He
definitely gives the film its visual impact that lasts.
Overall, I feel this film is very good, and only the interference of
Morgan Creek executives diminished and hindered Bill Blatty's vision.
Paul Schrader and Renny Harlin would also learn of this a over a decade
later when filming their respective prequels to The Exorcist, and Blatty
blamed no one but Morgan Creek for both versions' failures. Still,
despite these obstacles and tampering with the film, I honestly feel an
effective and enjoyable horror film shines through. Blatty showed
great talent and competence in both scripting and directing. Ultimately,
this is a great surprise considering the more maligned entris in this franchise
(save the original), and is indeed one hell of a terribly creepy film.
A good watch for a dark, lonely night. |