REVIEWS BY NICHOLAS J. MICHALAK • ALL RATINGS
ARE ON SCALE FROM 1 TO 10
BUY
DVD • IMDb SITE
BUY
FILM SCORE CD
BUY
SOUNDTRACK CD
|
"Underworld"
(2003) |
Reviewed by Nicholas J. Michalak
Rating: 4.5/10
When I first heard about the premise for this movie, I thought it was
gonna be one to watch. A MUST-SEE even. Simply put, that premise
was the dynamic of Romeo & Juliet set in the world of vampires &
werewolves. I was so very excited to see this movie! Through
all the trailers and TV spots. With all the months passing by, I
only got more anticipatory of this film's release. But in the week
of the theatrical release, I starting reading the reviews. They were
bad. Even the horror sites were saying it was a dull, boring, unoriginal,
unimaginative movie. Bloody Disgusting, Diabolical Dominion, and
Creature Corner all gave it BAD reviews. After that, and numerous
visits to RottenTomatoes.com, I chose against going to see this film that
I had been so anxious to see all year long. Now, after its release
on DVD, I finally decided to plunk down some bucks to rent it, and all
I can say is that all the reviews were right. But before I go any
further, let's TRY to lay down the plot for this quite dull and highly
non-innovative film.
Kate Beckinsale plays the vampire Selene, a Death Dealer whose job it
is to hunt down and kill off the Lycans (aka 'Werewolves'). At film's
start, she gives us a nice expositional voice over to help with the film's
general setup. A war between the two species has raged for 600 years,
and despite the fact that no one truly knows how it all began (digging
into the past is forbidden amongst vampires), the war continues.
Though, the vampires believe that the war is soon to end, it would leave
Selene's kind, the Death Dealers, as an obsolete faction among the decadent
lifestyle the vamps have adopted. Meanwhile, two werewolves are shadowing
the footsteps of a mortal man, Michael Corvin (Scott Speedman), but for
what purpose, that is not revealed for another HOUR, maybe more!
A shoot-out goes down in a subway station between the vamps and the 'wolves,
amongst humans. We get our first look at the werewolf transformation,
and it's not half bad. Now, at this point I would like to rush the
plot synopsis quickly along, but there is too much to simply sum in one
paragraph, but I'll try.
On the vampire side of things, it is only a short time before they are
to reawake one of their elders from a centuries' old sleep. These
elders are held in a tomb of sorts inside the Victorian-esque mansion all
these vampires live in. In the meantime, their acting leader is Kraven
(Shane Brolly), a very self-minded bloodsucker who is Selene's greatest
obstacle. This becomes even more evident when Selene's interest is
peaked as to why the Lycans were following Corvin, and she ultimately is
forced to go against everyone's orders to discover the truth. While
investigating Corvin at his apartment, a small pack of Lycans come looking
for him, including their leader, Lucian (Michael Sheen). During this
encounter, Lucian takes a heep of a bite out of Michael's shoulder, and
damning him to become a werewolf, in time. At the tailend of this
encounter, an amazing stunt is performed where Sheen chases after Selene's
luxury import car, and just runs up atop of it. How it's performed,
I'll tell you later, but no wirework was involved.
Anyway, to find guidance and wisdom as to what plans the 'wolves might
be forging, Selene awakens the one who made her into a vampire: Viktor
(Bill Nighy). He is awakened in a manner not far off from Hellraiser.
He must be regenerated via the absorbtion of blood, but they throw a nice
twist on it. Now, even though Viktor has been awakened, Selene STILL
is faced with adversity where she believed that she would have an ally.
It only forces her into an even more rebellious state to uncover what treachery
has occured amongst these immortal enemies. There is, of course,
more to this film, but I will not divulge such spoilers to you.
Yes, I know, that was more than one paragraph, but I tried. I
guess the first thing that I realized with this movie was that the action
sequences are really nothing new. How many shoot-outs have we seen
in movies?! Far too many to even consider counting, I'm sure.
And that's basically the only way the vamps and the 'wolves fight.
They pull out guns and a few other weapons. Both sides now have bullets
designed specifically to kill their rival species. The 'wovles have
irradiated ultraviolet bullets, and the vamps have bullets which induce
silver directly into the 'wolves blood stream. Also, it is clearly
stated that werewolves are allergic to silver, and so, that answers THAT!
But a lot of other rules are tossed completely out the window such as vampires
now have reflections, don't seem to have any bit of flying ability, and
well, don't really have much powers at all. They are undead bloodsuckers
that are incredibly agile, nothing more. And any charm or verocity
that have become characteristic staples of vampires are certainly drained
from THESE vampires. Though, the werewolves don't seem to have much
of a change, except for the fact that they can now switch between their
two forms at will, but it takes a full moon to initially trigger their
transformation after they're first bitten. Also, if you are bitten
by both a vampire and werewolf - YOU DIE! It's made clear that no
one has ever survived a bite from both species. I don't mind the
vampires not changing into bats - I left that part FAR behind since John
Carpenter's VAMPIRES. I mean, HELL, none of the vampires in The
Lost Boys ever change into bats (though, they COULD fly), and so, it's
nothing that annoys me in the slightest.
Now, since the action sequences are tired and bland, the next question
has to be: Is the movie fun at all? No. Everything and
everyone is taken very seriously here. Not a singular joke is cracked,
not one witty play, nothing humorous of the sort makes its way into this
film. Which makes for a very dull 121 minutes. I don't even
think anyone in this movie even cracks a damn SMILE! Doesn't seem
like THEY are having any more fun than the audience. Also, the film
never really delves much past the surface of these characters to give us
any sort of emotional involvement with them. And in fact, the only
character I really, really liked was Lucian. I don't know if it's
his look, or his performance, but I really thought he was a bad ass character.
Kate Beckinsale IS quite seriously sexy in her skin-tight PVC leather /
rubber cat suit and corset, but it's a hard thing for an attractive young
woman to NOT be sexy in such an outfit. Her character is the heroine,
but despite the script's best efforts, she's rather mono-emotional (as
practically all of the characters are). The acting isn't really bad
bad, it's rather dry, and maybe somewhat overacted more times than one
should be subjected to, but it is decent considering the material the cast
had to work with. Though, there's no emotional depth here at all.
So, we're left with rather flat characters.
Now, we hit the assessment of the plot (and yes, the film feels, at
least, as long as this review). The plot is very tiresome.
Not that it's reptitive or anything like that, but because we keep getting
more and more elements added to this plot without reason. Well, without
reason until the last 30 mintues of the motion picture. And by that
time, you REALLY don't know who to root for. Those who you believed
to be the villians aren't REALLY doing anything villianous, but some of
the despised characters are despised for a reason. Though, some of
the protagonists become deserving of all that they have coming to them.
So, through the whole film you're acting like Michael Corvin after being
bit saying, "What the HELL is going on?!" You get tired of waiting
for the plot to progress to a point where you actually know WHAT the real
plot is! And once you get there, there's not much left of the film
to hold any bit of interest in you. Though, one bit of backstory
was a rather familiar idea, as I thought it up back in 1999 for a script
I still have yet to write! That concerning what service the werewolves
provided for the vampires, centuries ago.
And for the final bit of assessment, the special effects. I am
so very glad that director Len Wiseman chose to do as much of the effects
practically as possible. The werewolf designs are very impressive,
and certainly helps to inject much to the feel of the film, keeping it
as grounded as possible. Though, the werewolves don't happen to showcase
much movement or flexiblity in this form, but when they're crawling rabidly
along the walls, they are very animated (not in the CG sense). Also,
remember that stunt I mentioned earlier involving Michael Sheen running
up atop an accelerating automobile? That was executed using a tarp
of sorts attached to the back end of the car, and Michael Sheen simply
ran up that tarp while the car was in motion, and thus, making him seem
like he was actualy running at 35 miles per hour. Very cool, yet
simple stunt. You can catch that on the DVD. Now, the vampires
don't have much makeup of effects work aside from their fangs and contact
lenses, but Viktor is a whole 'nother story. As he goes through a
regenerative process, a series of progressive effects were designed for
him. They were full body casts, no suits. The DVD documents
it well, and is one HELL of a creature effect undertaking that was WELL
worth it. Though, the design of the vampire-Lycan hybrid was HIGHLY
disappointing! He's not impressive or intimidating in appearance
at all. In fact, it looks like any one of the werewolves could slash
him to BITS! It's basically a vampire with an odd ribcage and deep,
dark blue skin, nothing more. His abilities are more impressive,
but it's still a grave disappointment on both counts, to me. Nothing
impressive at all, as is practically everything with this movie.
So, to sum it up. Underworld is a mix of Blade and
The
Matrix (maybe a bit of The Crow woven in), but it lacks any
of what made those such entertaining films. There's no fun, no excitement,
or character depth to be had in Underworld. A whole boat load
of plot that just weighs this film down FAR, FAR too much, and it's not
even that great of a plot. Add that to the fact that the characters'
emotions are practically as flat as a board. Also, I agree with a
few others that the role of Michael Corvin was miscast. Scott Speedman
just doesn't play it with anything but weakness. And when the finale
comes, he is not one bit convincing as the bad ass that he should've been.
Other cast members are simply uninteresting, and aren't really worth our
time....or attention (except for Sheen & Beckinsale). And as
I've said for a couple of movies on this site, great creature and makeup
effects do not a good film make. And as strange as this may sound,
I stick with a quote by George Lucas from the time of the original trilogy:
"A special effect a tool, a means of telling a story. A special effect
without a story is a pretty boring thing." It is VERY true.
You can have the very best special, creature, and makeup effects ever in
the history of cinema, but if everything else in the film is bad, then
you're film is going to be very boring, no matter how well-made or spectacular
your effects might be.
Now, wrap ALL of this together and add in the most obvious and cliché
of sequel segue endings, and you've got Underworld. A greatly
disappointing film that could've been a great, fun ride with fabulous creature
effects, stunts, and at least, somewhat interesting characters. The
script was done all wrong, and took itself FAR too seriously. Not
opening itself up for some fun. It's all played rather grimly without
as much as a single one-liner from anyone. We get so much plot, a
good deal of backstory, but belated answers and no character depth.
Plus, the look of this film is tired as well. All blue and gray filters
that make the film's look as grim as everything else in it. The whole
movie takes place at night, in shadows, indoors, or in subterranean enviroments.
It makes the film feel very visually dull and bland. And I'm not
even gonna BOTHER critiquing the leather-heavy costume department as this
has been a BIG trend since The Crow, or even moreso since The
Matrix. Can't seem to outlive this trend, can we? Simply
put, this is a painfully derivative film that takes ideas, production designs,
costumes, action set pieces, and pretty much anything else you can think
of from other sources. And other, better ideas that could've injected
some life into this rather dead film are jettisoned for bland, tired ones.
So, you think this review has gone on long enough, huh? Well,
now you know how long this film feels! In the very conclusion, I
have rated this one a 4.5 out 10, or more specifically, number TWO on my
list of the five WORST Films of 2003 on my
homepage (right behind of the even MORE painful disappointment that
was Dreamcatcher). I never got excited or deeply invested
in the plot or characters during the viewing of this movie on DVD.
I don't think you should avoid it like the plague (there were a great deal
of horror films released in 2003 that GREATLY deserve that tag), but it's
not one you should rush out to see. A disappointment? Indeed.
Greatly. |
Underworld (2003)
Starring: Kate Beckinsale, Scott Speedman, Michael Sheen, Bill Nighy,
Shane Brolly
Director: Len Wiseman
Writers: Kevin Grevioux, Len Wiseman & Danny McBride
Studio: Screen Gems, Inc.
Rated: R for strong violence/gore and some language. |
BUY
DVD • IMDb SITE
BUY
FILM SCORE CD
BUY
SOUNDTRACK CD
 |
"Underworld:
Unrated Extended Cut" (2003) |
Reviewed by Nicholas J. Michalak
Rating: 7.5/10
Well, I believe I should have given this movie a second viewing quite
a while ago. After seeing and enjoying the sequel this past weekend,
I chose to seek out this two-disc extended cut of the original Underworld.
Things are more enjoyable, and more importantly, coherent in a second viewing
(even with two solid years between viewings). Anyway, this version
of the film has 12 minutes of additional footage with 11 minutes of replacement
footage. The audio commentary with director Len Wiseman and cast
members Kate Beckinsale & Scott Speedman help to mark the new footage
(quite important to me only seeing the theatrical version once).
More backstory is revealed on our leads, and a few other tidbits are injected.
Now, there's really no extra gore here, and so, don't let the "unrated"
moniker get you excited. It's just a marketing tool for horror fans,
plain and simple. Now, I will endeavour to make a far briefer synopsis
this time out.
A war between vampires and lycans has raged for numerous centuries,
but the reasons why there ever was a war is unknown to most everyone.
Digging into the past is forbidden amongst vampires, and that's just the
least of what's forbidden. There are many unknowns that none question,
but the vampire death dealer Selene (Kate Beckinsale) soon raises all those
questions. After tracking a pair of lycans and subsequently engaging
in a shootout in a subway station, she becomes convinced that they were
after a human named Michael Corvin (Scott Speedman). She persists
in unravelling this mystery, even moreso when met with resistence from
the decadent second-in-command Kraven (Shane Brolly). He pushes so
hard against her that she becomes even more suspicious, and goes to desperate
measures. She awakens elder vampire Viktor (Bill Nighy) a century
ahead of schedule, and seeks his help. With his power of command
and physicality, he easily reaffirms control of things. Meanwhile,
the lycans' plan slowly is revealed, but not fully until far later in the
film. In any case, this plan has everything to do with Michael's
bloodline, and with the survival of the lycan species. Selene soon
becomes Michael's only ally when it seems all are gunning for him, and
neither of them know why, not truly. Ultimately, all the lies, deceit,
deception, and secrets are made known, and the consequences of them all
will change everything for both species.
When I first watched this film, it was very confusing and tiring on
a mental level. There were so many plot twists and turns that from
one scene to the next I didn't know who was a villian, an ally, or a hero.
I was completely lost on the geography of this plot, let alone where these
characters stood within it. By the end, nearly everyone you believed
was a protagonist or an antagonist flipped sides, and it was all very confusing.
I felt like Michael Corvin wondering just, "what the fuck is going on?"
This time through, I was fully aware of where the plot was going, and everything
made much more sense. A second viewing allows you to be "in the know"
about the intentions, schemes, and treachery of all. It allows you
to enjoy the film more since you are not trying to re-decifer the plot
every few minutes.
Now, I still find the action sequences to be lacking. A shootout
is a shootout - every action flick has one. Granted, it would be
silly for the vampires and lycans to be doing battle with swords and battle
axes since these are technologically evolved times, but after seeing the
sequel, Underworld: Evolution, there are other ways to create multiple
action sequences unique within one film and make them exciting and dynamic.
Since I had already seen this movie, I knew what to expect from the action
sequences, and so, I was able to enjoy them more. But still, they
could have been much more impressive and unique.
I still give major praise for the effects in this film, both practical
and computer generated. They are exponentially better than the cheesy,
third-rate CGI in Van Helsing, and nothing here comes off cheap.
It's all wonderfully designed and executed. After watching some of
the featurettes on disc two of this set, I got to appreciating the development
of this film even more than before. I do retain the belief that this
film could have benefitted from a bit less dreary visuals. The desaturated
colors really bring down the potential beauty of this motion picture. The
Crow absolutely had an insane amount of darkness, and a heavily gothic
look to it, but it is a beautiful film. It didn't use desaturated
colors, but instead used the contrast of light and dark. I believe
the same could've been done here, and made the visuals much more compelling.
Still, the cinematography is fabulous, and the production design is deeply
intricate.
The music as well as the costume design is directly in line with that
of The Matrix - industrial rock remixes and tight black leather
n' latex. Yes, it's been done to death, but it certainly works fantastically
well here. Kate Beckinsale looks all the more beautiful and sexy
the more you see her. The lycans have a far more down n' dirty look
as they live a more low class lifestyle than the aristocratic vampires.
I guess leather attire will always be some undefinable symbol of coolness
(hey, I have a leather trench coat and biker jacket). So, despite
my previous negative attitude towards said choice in costume desgn, I really
won't knock it now. It's cool, and I'll leave it at that.
The quality of the acting doesn't change in this extended cut, we just
get more of it. I speak nothing negative about it, and knowing where
things ultimately lead up to not only in this film, but the next, I truly
understand the coldness of some characters. Those that survive this
film definitely show far more depth in the sequel. Though, I still
have to praise Michael Sheen for bringing such a great character like Lucian
to life. He does an incredibly intriguing job with him, and by far,
proves Lucian to be the most in-depth and emotionally invested character
here. The rest of the cast has acting chops to spare, and while Speedman
may seem miscast in this film, I think him coming into his own in the sequel
really makes up for anything he may appear to lack in this film.
All in all, with two years later and a fresh perspective along with
the knowledge of the sequel with me, I appreciate this movie much more.
The story does drag in the middle (even moreso in this extended cut), but
it really picks up near the end. I recommend that anyone who may
have disliked or was disappointed with this film should give it a second
viewing. Being aware of the plot and its progression will allow you
to appreciate the overall film much more. Your mind is more free
to enjoy the film more instead of trying to keep up with plot twists.
Simply put, you'll spend much less time being confused, and more time enjoying
yourself. Checking out this extended cut should be an option for
you, but it doesn't offer anything greatly important regarding the plot,
let alone the action, but does offer more on the characters themselves. |
Underworld (2003)
Starring: Kate Beckinsale, Scott Speedman, Michael Sheen, Bill Nighy,
Shane Brolly
Director: Len Wiseman
Writers: Kevin Grevioux, Len Wiseman & Danny McBride
Studio: Screen Gems, Inc.
Rated: Unrated |
IMDb SITE
• BUY
DVD
BUY
BLU-RAY DISC
BUY
FILM SCORE CD
BUY
SOUNDTRACK CD
 |
"Underworld:
Evolution" (2006) |
Reviewed by Nicholas J. Michalak
Rating: 7.5/10
For whatever reason, I chose to give this sequel a fair chance despite
my very negative reaction to the first film. It might've been my
extreme absence from seeing new horror films in the last few years, or
just that it may have seemed a bit more developed than the first (by way
of trailers and such). Whatever the case, this past Saturday I caught
a matinee showing of it, and yes, I actually garnered some enjoyment from
it. Before I get into the critique, let's familiarize you with the
premise of Underworld: Evolution.
Eight centuries ago
unknown to humanity, a blood fued raged
between a ruling class of vampires
and a rebellious legion of werewolves
known as lycans.
Legend tells that the war began
with two brothers,
the immortal sons of Alexander Corvinus
Markus, bitten by bat,
became the blood leader of the vampires.
William, bitten by wolf,
became the first and most powerful lycan.
This sequel picks up just exactly where the first film ended.
The lies about the war between vampire and lycan have been uncovered, many
former allies and enemies lie dead, and the vampire death dealer Selene
(Kate Beckinsale) and the first hybrid of the two immortal species, Michael
Corvin (Scott Speedman), are now on the run. Meanwhile, vampire elder
Markus (Tony Curran) has been revived. He is the very first and most
powerful vampire, and he shows it from the very first minute on screen
following his resurrection. He absorbs the blood memories of the
lycan doctor that was slain in the crypt, and comes up to speed on all
the recent betrayals and treachery. He goes hunting down Selene to
learn all she knows, more than even she is aware of. Markus knows
that Viktor deserved the end he got, as the pre-title flashback sequence
shows, but the intentions of Markus are much more frightening, volatile,
and lethal than those in the previous film. As Markus tries to move
his plans forward, Michael & Selene hideout wherever possible, and
eventually become more intimate with one another. More secrets and
hidden truths begin to unfold, and Markus' ultimate plan is unveiled as
he wants to create a new race forged by the purest of both vampire and
lycan. Unknowingly, Selene holds one major key to Markus' plans,
but there is much vengence for him to reap along the way. Ultimately,
our heroes must evolve to battle this new enemy or perish in its wake.
One of the things that I first enjoyed about this sequel were the more
exciting and unique action sequences. No more are we treated to shootout
after shootout, but we have much more phsyical combat on top of some nice
chase sequences. Every action sequence is different from the last,
whether in context or geography. It made this film much more lively
and intense. Secondly, Scott Speedman really comes more into his
"evolved" character of the vamp-lycan hybrid Michael Corvin. He's
involved in more smash mouth brawls and chase scenes. He's a more
active member in the story despite having much less pivitol importance
to it instead of riding the wild wave carrying him along to unknown desitnations.
Selene still does much to protect and guide him as he becomes more familiar
with what he is, but he's not helpless by a longshot. Also, the design
of the hybrid is more evolved as well, and yes, I am using the subtitle
of this film a lot. Though, it is justified because there's a lot
of evolution with this sequel. Anyway, with a bigger budget, but
not an overinflated one, this film has some upgraded effects that truly
benefit the characters and story. Corvin's hybrid creature design
is more satisfying to me as it takes on a few more werewolf characteristics,
and the creature itself tends to be more animalistic.
There are fewer characters this time around, but the depth of them is
much improved. There's more emotion here, especially with Selene.
She's no longer some cold killing machine, trying to fight back against
everything and everyone. She becomes intimate with Michael, opening
her emotions to him, and there's no denying their love for one another.
With no other allies, Michael is all she has, and Selene is the only one
that Michael can latch onto. Without each other, I doubt they could
survive emotionally or psychologically for too long. One of the new
characters is Tanis (Steven Mackintosh), a vampire historian that has been
exiled for about three centuries, or so it was believed. He's a weasel,
a real piece of scum that shouts back to the majority of the cast of characters
in the previous film, but is easily more enjoyable than despicable.
Not surprisingly, Tanis has interesting ties to Lucian . Another
new character is portrayed by Sir Dereck Jacobi, a revered British actor
of stage and screen. His character is wholly pivitol to absolutely
everything, and is greatly responsible for cleaning up after the messes
of both the vampires and lycans. He helps keep their underworld as
hidden as possible - mainly because he's partly responsible for its existence
- but none have been aware of his existence until now.
And the new villian, Markus, proves to be quite an adversary for all,
especially Selene & Michael. He certainly has a swirl of emotions
being manipulated and opposed by Viktor for centuries. He seeks to
free his brother William, the most ravenous and powerful lycan ever, and
together, no one will be able to survive them. Markus is truly frightening
and indiscriminately lethal. He knows what he wants, and will tear
through whomever he must to achieve his god-like goals. He's not
as intriguing a villian as Lucian was (who actually proved to not be the
villian at all in the first film), but he still does not disappoint.
While Lucian was someone with more carefully laid plans (one part revenge,
one part survival for his species) who had patience to carry them out subversively
and work with a higher level of honor than those around him, Markus is
purely about revenge, and has no use for being subversive. He's very
upfront and direct with his approach to achieving his goals. Being
as powerful as he is, he has no fear, and thus, destroys whatever he wishes.
Tony Curran portrays him fantastically through and through. I so
enjoyed his performance - the strength, the confidence, the anger, the
defiance - it was powerhouse. He easily makes the movie, and he is
definitely a marvelous actor I intend to pay close attention to.
The effects in this film are even more impressive than the first film.
There are a lot of effects here that you would swear are practical, but
don't seem logistically possible. The visual effects department deserves
major credit for their amazing work here! There's not a bad or cheesy
piece of CGI here, if you can even decifer what is CGI to begin with.
In any case, this is a major visual effects achievement, and everyone knows
that bad CGI can completely kill any movie (especially one with such a
serious tone as this one). Yes, the dead serious tone persists here,
but there's a couple of smirks to be had here and there.
The music of Underworld remains the same with the industrial
rock remixes and such. The score is also fantastic, and possibly
a bit more dynamic than before (mainly due to the demands of the story
and action). We get a lot more action early on, and would have to
say that there is a higher degree of gore here. It's not massive
amount of gore, but more gruesome since Markus is a far more violent character
than any we saw in the original Underworld. There's also less
"technobabble" this time around because there's nothing new to describe
in relation to it. Simply put, all the medical jargon and related
exposition more or less applies here as well. It's already been established
in the first film, and so, there's no need to say it all again. There's
ultimately less exposition overall, but there's still plenty of backstory
to explore.
Basically, I found this movie enjoyable. The action is far fresher
than that in the first movie. There's easily much more character
depth, allowing you to really feel more for these characters, and to become
closer to them. There's not as much mystery this time around, and
the scope of it all might seem smaller. This is partly due having
fewer characters than before, and this film takes place more outside in
mountainous regions than inside the mansion where there was a lot of production
designs to show off (as well as extras). Though, I believe Underworld:
Evolution makes up for it on many levels. Also, after viewing
the extended cut of the original Underworld, I believe both films
are equal, but on different levels. What one lacks, the other makes
up for. One film's weakness is the other's strength, and so, they
even out in the end. I believe if you melded both films together
into one, capitalizing on both of their strengths, you'd have one bad ass
movie, but instead we get two that are pretty damn good in their own ways.
So, I give a 7.5 out of 10 for Underworld: Evolution. |
Underworld: Evolution (2006)
Starring: Kate Beckinsale, Scott Speedman, Tony Curran, Steven Mackintosh,
Sir Dereck Jacobi
Director: Len Wiseman
Writer: Danny McBride
Studio: Screen Gems, Inc.
Rated: R for pervasive strong violence and gore, some sexuality/nudity
and language. |
MOVIE
REVIEWS • MAIN
MENU
|